HomeUncategorized12/17-18 News Roundup and Open Thread
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Vulnerable House Dems to DCCC: You’re jeopardizing our reelection

“This is a real f—ing problem.”

That’s how one vulnerable House Democrat summarized growing discord between members in battleground districts and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. That member and five others POLITICO spoke with in the past week alleged that the Democratic organization whose purpose is to help the party keep the House next year is instead hurting their chances of reelection.
The members were granted anonymity to speak freely about their frustrations with the strategy DCCC Chair Sean Patrick Maloney (N.Y.) has adopted in dozens of competitive districts. Their complaints fall roughly into three categories.

1. Botched messaging
Universally, the members said there’s been too much talk about Donald Trump and not enough focus on pocketbook issues. Terry McAuliffe banged the anti-Trump drum constantly on his way to losing the race for Virginia governor. But at-risk members we spoke with worry that Maloney is still embracing the Trump-as-boogeyman strategy, blasting Republicans as extreme for seeking his blessing or otherwise supporting him.

“This is crazy to me that the DCCC is rolling out a playbook that they know doesn’t work and that they encouraged people in 2018 not to use,” said the member who dropped the f-bomb to describe the situation. The person argued that in 2018, the committee gave the opposite advice — focus relentlessly on pocketbook issues and let Trump’s antics speak for themselves — and Democrats flipped more than 40 seats to take the chamber.

The messaging issues extend beyond Trump. As cases challenging Roe v. Wade have reached the Supreme Court, the DCCC has sent dozens of press releases attacking Republican candidates and lawmakers for opposing abortion rights. But one front-liner called abortion “a lightning rod” in their district — and said the DCCC should steer clear of it as a campaign issue.

“We should leave it up to Planned Parenthood and all the reproductive organizations to get in there and support candidates that are pro-choice and leave it at that,” the member, who like other vulnerable Democrats supports abortion rights, said. “I’m not going to go out there and start bashing people for being pro-life. It would be a big mistake in my district.”

2. Jamming them on policy
Former DCCC Chair Cheri Bustos (Ill.), who represented a Trump district, was known for pushing back on leadership in private in order to protect vulnerable members from tough votes. But Maloney has taken the opposite tack: In August, as Speaker Nancy Pelosi was trying to corral moderates to vote for a $3.5 trillion budget, the DCCC infuriated members by threatening to withhold campaign money from them if they opposed the resolution. (The DCCC denied this.)

Then this fall, Maloney routinely sided with leadership over at-risk members who wanted Pelosi to allow a standalone vote on the infrastructure bill. He attacked one of the members, Josh Gottheimer, on Twitter after the New Jersey Democrat criticized Pelosi for “breach[ing] her firm, public commitment” to do so.

One member relayed another anecdote: During the fall, liberal outside groups spent millions on TV ads pressuring vulnerable House Democrats to back Build Back Better. The members pleaded with the DCCC to get the groups to back off, but committee officials refused. (The DCCC says it’s illegal for the committee to tell an outside group how to spend money.)

3. Frustrations with the DCCC chief
Maloney often says he understands the travails of front-liners firsthand: Trump barely won his district in 2016 — though Biden carried it by 5 points in 2020. But several of the members he’s charged with protecting don’t see it that way, and argue that his more left-leaning views are coloring the work of the committee.

“What’s problematic is not only is he pushing the wrong strategy. … The biggest problem is that he’s attacking front-line members for taking a different perspective,” the first lawmaker said. “If you want to win purple and red seats, you have to distance yourself from other Democrats. He is a part of this ‘party purity’ march that is just going to ensure that we are deep in the minority.”

Several of the members suspect Maloney is trying to use his DCCC perch to climb the leadership ladder — essentially raising his own profile at the expense of their political fortunes. Doing the job right, these members say, means sometimes having to back them over progressive members in safer districts.

“I think Sean Patrick’s ‘leadership’ — and please use air quotes on that — at the DCCC is the reason why we should not have elected colleagues running that organization,” said the first member. “Because it’s not about protecting the majority; it’s about Sean Patrick Maloney. … We’ve got a vanity project.”

The DCCC strongly refutes any suggestion that Maloney is focused on anything but keeping the majority. The committee sent a dozen examples of Maloney saying in interviews that at-risk members will win by highlighting their legislative achievements.

“We agree completely, this election will be won on our record of results, not by talking about Trump,” said DCCC spokesperson Chris Hayden. “That’s why Chairman Maloney has been fighting like hell to pass the president’s transformative agenda, which enjoys supermajority support in swing districts.”

The committee asked vulnerable Democrats to send POLITICO positive statements about Maloney. About a half-dozen did, and so did Pelosi. “Sean is an incredible leader who listens to front-line members on our battle-tested strategies for success and encourages us to run the best campaigns for our districts,” said Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.).

The DCCC certainty was useful to help the $hill and Byedone when Bernie is was running.


anonymous corporatists. they wouldn’t be “vunerable” if they helped people irl.


What a load of BS!!!!!!!!!! These so-called “Dimocrats” keep running as GOPuke Lite and guess what?! The voters sit home or vote for the real GOPuke!! I’m talking about you, Stephanie Murphy!! I didn’t vote for your worthless GOPuke arse 2 years, and I sure as h3ll’s bells won’t next year! I’m voting for several issues: declaring climate change a code red emergency, supporting unions, M4A, and fixing public education including supporting VoTech. They don’t support it, see ya.


t&r jcb❣️🎄🐻🐻‍❄️🌊🐕🐋👍🏻💫🌺🎄🎄🎄💖



Lowkey to LD: hope you and JD are well! 🙂





Inflation is peaking at 6.8 percent. Real wages are falling, particularly among the middle class. Republicans smell blood, hoping to make rising prices the centerpiece of their midterm strategy. Democrats have pointed their own fingers, accusing the opposition of rooting against the economy for political gain rather than helping to fix the problems.

Given all this, you could have easily overlooked that the most focused legislation to alleviate a key driver of inflation passed the House last Wednesday with 364 votes.

The Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2021 (OSRA 2021), the first update to ocean shipping rules in nearly 25 years, begins to reverse a punishing 1990s-era deregulation in the maritime portion of the supply chain. It’s unique in several ways: an anti-monopoly initiative from a federal government that has at best tolerated and at worst actively promoted monopolies for decades, a sharply bipartisan effort in a polarized and toxic Congress, and an expansion of regulatory power to structure markets that breaks with a federal bias toward self-regulation and laissez-faire posturing.

And “it all began in an almond orchard and a rice field,” its co-author told me.


NC has been watching this, too. I have one complaint: quit growing almonds in a da##ed desert, So. CA. They need water and it’s killing the aquifers there.


You might enjoy this article orl ✌️

Native Americans’ farming practices may help feed a warming world

..Biosphere 2, a unique center affiliated with the University of Arizona that’s part of a movement aimed at reimagining and remaking agriculture in a warming world. In the Southwest, projects are looking to plants and farming practices that Native Americans have long used as potential solutions to growing worries over future food supplies. At the same time, they are seeking to build energy resilience.

“We’re taking Indigenous knowledge,” said Greg Barron-Gafford, a professor who studies the intersection of plant biology and environmental and human factors. But instead of relying on tree shade, “we’re underneath an energy producer that’s not competing for water.”

On both sides of the Arizona border with Mexico, scientists are planting experimental gardens and pushing the potential of an “agrivoltaic” approach. Thirsty crops such as fruits, nuts and leafy greens — which require elaborate irrigation systems that have pulled vast quantities of water from underground aquifers and the Colorado and other rivers — are nowhere to be found.

The Tohono O’odham have farmed in the Sonoran Desert for several thousand years. Like many Indigenous groups, they now are on the front lines of climate change, with food security a paramount concern. Their expansive reservation, nearly the size of Connecticut, has just a few grocery stores. It is a food desert in a desert where conditions are only getting more extreme.

“The key concept,” he said, “is that we’re trying to fit the crops to the environment rather than remaking the environment.”


this looks like a good bill to lessen the power of shipping (at least ocean) shipping cartels.